Saturday, November 6, 2010

No More ZLB

Can we please stop talking about the zero lower bound?

Krugman today insists that we do, in fact, face a problem of inadequate demand. And he's right! But he glosses this as an "excess supply of savings even at a zero interest rate," which isn't right at all.

Let's be clear: There is not "an" interest rate, certainly not a zero one. There are various interest rates, and the ones that are relevant to saving and investment remain high. The BAA corporate bond rate (the red line in the figure below) is currently at 5.7 percent -- pretty much exactly where it was in the first half of 2005. And given that inflation is substantially lower than it was five years ago, that particular real interest rate is not only not zero, it's gone up.


The real question is, can reducing the federal funds rate reduce the economically important interest rates? Now, obviously the answer is No if the fed funds rate (the blue line in the graph) is as low as it can go; in this sense the ZLB is real. But the answer can also be No when the fed funds rate is well above zero, if there's no reliable link between the overnight Treasury rate and the rates businesses borrow at; and that seems to have been the case since sometime in the '90s. As the figure shows, the Fed's recent rate reductions didn't reduce bond rates at all, even before the Fed Funds rate hit zero; and all the hikes earlier in the decade didn't raise bond rates either. You'd see a similar picture if you looked at any other economically relevant interest rate. In general, as my friend Hasan Comert shows in his just-defended dissertation, the Fed lost control of the important interest rates some time ago. So the best thing you can say for the zero lower bound, is that arriving there has dramatized a truth that should have been evident for some time already.
As usual, Keynes got it right: "The acuteness and the peculiarity of our contemporary problem arises out of the possibility that the average rate of interest which will allow a reasonable average level of employment is one so unacceptable to wealth-owners that it cannot be readily established merely by manipulating the quantity of money. ... The most stable, and the least easily shifted, element in our contemporary economy has been hitherto, and may prove to be in future, the minimum rate of interest acceptable to the generality of wealth-owners." The failure of interest rates to move to a level compatible with full employment is not a technical problem, but a structural one.

3 comments:

  1. Just to spell out the argument a bit more, the point is that a central bank able to control interest rates and/or the "money supply" requires a particular set of institutional and regulatory arrangements. In the case of the US it was (a) statutory reserve requirements; (b) the lack of a secondary market for many commercial bank assets, making the holding of reserves necessary for liquidity purposes; (c) the lack of high-return short-term investments for commercial banks, so less pressure to mobilize reserves; (d) the absence of competing institutions not subject to reserve requirements. The latter three factors made the statutory requirement effective, by reducing incentives to evade it; they were all connected with the partitioning of the financial system into differentiated institutions serving different functions and markets.

    Without those conditions, central banks can't do monetary policy as conventionally understood. But that doesn't mean they're unimportant! It just means we're back in the world of the Bank of England under the 1844 Bank Act, when the lender-of-last resort function was the sole or at least main purpose of central banks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello everyone am ASHA from USA am using this medium to announce to the world and those in need of financial stability to look no further but contact davidbenjaminltd@outlook.com who helped me with the card in less than 1 week after being scammed of my money by others and yet no card. Are you in need of a loan? Or some sort of financial distress and need saving, SEIZE this opportunity and get rich in no time. There are no hidden charges and they deal on transparency basis. I am forever grateful to DAVID BENJAMIN for changing my life a whole new after being scammed by 2 companies who took advantage of me Contact via email on
    davidbenjaminltd@outlook.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. BEST WAY TO HAVE GOOD AMOUNT TO START A GOOD BUSINESS or TO START LIVING A GOOD LIFE..... Hack and take money directly from any ATM Machine Vault with the use of ATM Programmed Card which runs in automatic mode.This is an opportunity you all have been waiting for. Get the new programmed ATM BLANK CARD that can hack any ATM MACHINE and withdraw money from any where in the world. You do not require anybody's account number before you can use it. Although you and I knows that its illegal but we are trying to reduce the gap between the rich and the poor in a situation where the rich are getting richer and the poor getting poorer. Get yours now and provide for your kids, make your kids happy by providing for all their needs. Email us on: frederickbrooks@outlook.comThere is no risk using it. It has SPECIAL FEATURES, that makes the machine unable to detect this very card,and its transaction can't be traced . To get your own programmed blank ATM card, contact us on;frederickbrooks@outlook.com

    ReplyDelete